Local shopkeepers and concerned
residents in Walkley are taking on the might of Tesco.
3rd September 2007
Dear Sir
In response to Kenneth Macdonald (letters 31
August), rejecting Tesco is protectionism - protecting local communities,
protecting farming, protecting the environment and protecting
fair competition.
Studies show that the big supermarkets create
less jobs than local retailers and tend not to employ local firms
for maintenance and signage. They sell high volume popular items
very cheaply so other shops lose out on their most profitable
lines. While Tesco can afford to run new stores at a loss for
years, local traders do not have that luxury. Tesco gets it's
food cheaper from the farmers and wholesalers, pushing them into
deals that no other shop can compete with. Is that fair competition?
Furthermore, Tesco fails on providing ethically
produced food according to Action Aid and Oxfam. It has pushed
British farmers to the point of elimination according to the NFU,
The UK Competition Commission and Farmers for Action. It has consistently
refused to implement food standards guidelines recommended by
the Government. Finally, studies show that Tesco uses far more
energy, and so produces far more carbon dioxide, than local shops,
to sell the same goods.
Local shopkeepers and concerned residents in
Walkley are taking on the might of the Tesco legal and PR machine
who will be pushing the council to grant this application. It's
David and Goliath and, if local people don't want Tesco Express,
they need to make their voices heard in numbers now.
Yours Sincerely
Jason Leman
|