Most people want encouraging
trend in healthy school meals to continue.
30th August 2007
Dear Sir
News of an 8% drop in school meal take up in
Sheffield over the past year (Star website 24 August) is concerning
but everyone involved must hold their nerve. The response of Sallie
Swann, Sheffield Council's manager in charge of catering contracts,
is disappointing. After discussions with caterers she has asked
the Schools Food Trust to slow down changes to the menus.
It is just 28 months since the "cheap
as chips" scandal highlighted the council failing in it's
duty of care to our children. Another way to look at these figures
is that 92% of children have stayed with the new menus over the
past year and are now eating healthy school meals. This has to
be a massive step forward from April 2005 when junk food dominated
the menus.
The Schools Food Trust remain determined to
push through the plan for even stricter food standards. Obesity
and diabetes will cost the NHS billions in years to come so government
funding is money well spent. "Jamie's School Dinners"
triggered urgent change following a quarter of a century of budget
cuts and the government must keep funding the vital work of the
Schools Food Trust. They also need to urgently review the current
situation where healthy eating menus could disappear if councils
like Sheffield struggle to balance the books.
A future where children have Coco Pops for
breakfast, burger and chips for lunch and takeaway pizza and fizzy
drink for evening meal would have severe consequences for society
as a whole. Many parents and children are already showing that
they appreciate healthy meals and most people want this encouraging
trend to continue.
Yours Sincerely
Eamonn Ward
Sheffield Green Party
Original article
Rotherham kids buck the trend on school
meals
Rotherham kids are still tucking in to healthy
school dinners - despite evidence that in some areas of the country
children are shunning school meals.
The School Food Trust - set up to encourage
pupils to eat more healthily - is being urged to slow down planned
further changes to school meal menus.
The move comes after some local councils reported
a big drop in the number of pupils abandoning school dinners since
the last changes were introduced.
New school food standards were initiated two
years ago to cut down on the amount of fat, salt, and sugar being
consumed by pupils, in favour of fresh fruit, veg, and locally-sourced
produce.
In some parts of Britain catering managers
say new menus have led to a sharp drop in the number of secondary
pupils eating school dinners.
But in Rotherham the number of children eating school meals has
remained almost exactly the same.
A Rotherham Council spokesman said: "When
the new menus were brought in at the end of 2005 there was a very
slight drop in the number of children eating in school - but for
the past two years the numbers have remained stable.
"There is no evidence children in Rotherham
are boycotting the new menus. We serve up around 15,900 meals
a day and a lot of pupils have said how much they enjoy them."
Places like Hull, Bradford and York have all
reported a big drop in the number of children staying for school
dinners - and in Sheffield the number is said to have fallen by
eight per cent in a year.
Sheffield Council's manager in charge of catering
contracts, Sallie Swann, said: "We and our caterers have
had discussions with the School Food Trust ask if we can slow
down the changes to the menu. We are concerned about the numbers
dropping off in secondary schools."
The Schools Food Trust was set up by the Government
in 2005 to transform the food being eaten in school canteens.
It is now responsible for ensuring school menus meet even stricter
food standards.
The trust's media manager Emma Heesom said: "We have had
letters from caterers and we know some of them would like us to
slow down the changes to the menu.
"A slow change would have had its own
problems just like a short, sharp shock. There is no easy way
to change 20 years of pupils eating what they like when they like."
"We know a lot about what young people
don't like. What we need to do is find out what they do like."
|